What's New at CNBROWN.COM
July 31, 2010  
 Heating Oil Home > Frequently Asked Questions > Heating Oil vs. Natural Gas
  Heating Oil
   Heating Oil Home
   Products
   Services
   Payments
   Security & Privacy
   Pricing & Delivery
   Locations
   Special Offers
   Frequently Asked Questions
    Red Shield Advantage
    Heating Oil vs. Natural Gas
    Energy Savers
   Maine Oil Dealers Association Website
   Contact Us

 Heating Oil vs. Natural Gas
 Ten Important Questions to Ask About Your Choice in Heating Oil
 1. Which heating fuel is less expensive - oil or natural gas?

Currently -The price of heating oil is more than 20% less expensive than an equivalent amount of natural gas, with the residential price of natural gas being $1.10 per gallon during the last heating season. In fact, heating oil has been historically less expensive than natural gas in Maine, according to the U.S. Department of Energy data.

Long Term - While it is difficult to predict the future, the economists looking at the market availability and costs of the construction of the pipeline and rates that would have to be charged to be profitable conclude:

"...under most scenarios, most new Maine loads (potential gas markets) can only be reached at costs higher than existing alternative fuels, primarily no.2 and no.6 oil."

Reed Report - Maine Natural Gas Market Study, May 29, 1997. Commissioned by the Maine State Planning Offices.


 2. What would it cost me to convert my current system to natural gas?

It is important to get an objective evaluation of conversion costs and requirements. According to John E. Batey, former engineer with the U.S. Dept. of Energy, the real costs of conversion to a natural gas system will range from $1,000-$2,000. He also stressed that failure to perform conversions correctly will result in problems such as corrosion of system components and significantly lower efficiency, to safety hazards and economic loss with higher fuel cost and lengthy playback periods. These cautions were raised by The Consumer Energy Council of America, an independent consumer research group. In their brochure, "Oil, Gas, Or? (1991 and 1994) " the Council does not recommend conversion gas burners to replace oil burners because the economic return on investment is actually a loss. Instead, they advise that "Conservation makes more sense than switching from oil to gas."


 3. Can natural gas companies offer incentives to lure me in...then dramatically increase rates later?

There are legitimate reasons to be concerned. The recent filings of Bangor Gas and Northern Utilities that requested significant increases in future rates, indicate that the consumer should ask for exact costs of conversion and for the rates that will be charged for the next 10 years. 10 years because the natural gas companies have planned their rate increases that far ahead and can tell customers NOW.


 4. Which fuel is safer? Is one safer than the other?

This is the concern we hear most frequently from consumers. While a leak in your oil tank may cause temporary inconveniences, there have been no deaths or injuries associated with leaking oil tanks. The risks of injury are far greater with natural gas leaks and the statistics from the U.S. Dept. of Transportation's Office of Pipeline Safety show that between 1986-1998, natural gas pipeline accidents have resulted in the deaths of over 200 people, injured more than 1,700 people, and caused more than $300 million in property damage. So safety is a legitimate concern.


 5. In the event of an international crisis, would natural gas be more readily available than oil?

No. Maine's oil and natural gas supplies are dependent on virtually the same geographic origins. 50% of Maine's oil supply comes from U.S. sources with most of the remaining supply coming from Canada. Maine's new natural gas supply comes entirely from Canada.


 6. Is natural gas cleaner and more efficient?

This is a misperception that is refuted by studies done by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Dept. of Energy. According to these studies, heating oil and natural gas produce approximately the same levels of pollutants. Natural gas is not cleaner than heating oil. According to the U.S. Dept. of Energy and the Gas Appliances Manufacturers Association, heating oil equipment is actually more efficient, on average, than natural gas heating equipment.


 7. Is either natural gas or oil better for the environment?

No. Both fuel sources cause similar amounts of pollutants in the environment. Many environmentalists are concerned about the risks to our wetlands, rivers and forests, that will be the impact of gas pipeline construction, and about leaks and accidents that have occurred in existing pipelines. Further, many have expressed concern about natural gas as it is a power greenhouse gas which contributes to global warming.


 8. Will the pipeline be an economic boom for Maine and the communities it passes through?

Natural gas is being promoted by gas companies as an economic boom. While the construction of the pipelines will create temporary construction jobs, some of the contracts have gone to out-of-state construction companies, reducing the benefit to Maine workers.


 9. Is natural gas a boom to the tax base in the communities it goes through?

While the pipelines pay local fees to use right-of- ways, those fees do not compare to the impact of the jobs, excise taxes paid on vehicles, property taxes, and payroll taxes currently paid by the oil dealers of Maine. Maine oil dealers pay our state governments an estimated $49 million in sales and income takes every year. In the communities across the state where they have local offices, they pay an estimated $13.7 million in local property taxes. They currently have a payroll of $230 million per year, supporting 8,000 jobs for Maine people. This is money that gets recirculated in communities throughout the state in the purchase of goods and services.


 10. Will the state look to taxpayers utility ratepayers to subsidize the cost of the construction of the pipeline or to encourage use of gas with tax incentives?

There needs to be consumer vigilance in this area. The Reed Report, prepared for the Maine State Planning Office, suggested a number of rate structure policy issues and other ways that government policy could encourage the use of natural gas over other choices of fuel. Some question whether this is the proper role of government - promoting one fuel choice over another.


Consumers and elected officials need to be vigilant to insure that the costs of construction of these billion dollar pipelines, and losses in the early years of the pipeline's use, are not passed on to utility ratepayers or taxpayers by utility companies setting up gas distribution businesses.

Consumers need to be told the truth about future rate hikes that will be necessary to cover costs before they make a decision to change fuels.

 These questions were taken from a handout by the Maine Oil Dealers Association.
 C.N. Brown Company, P.O. Box 200, South Paris, Maine 04281 | Telephone: (207) 743-9212 Powered By WinXnet Inc.